The virus is globalism’s trump card, and get-out-of-jail card, all in one.

Today, New Zealand wakes up to a second term under the charismatic Jacinda Ardern, with a lead so clear as to mean the Labour-Green coalition is in question. That all seems wonderful and exciting, until you unpack the brave new future this foretells and don’t just go by what it says on the tin. Sustainable Development is a Labour plank and a left-wing plank everywhere, which has been exposed as shiny packaging for anti-sovereign globalism, using climate-guilt as the necessary emotional stick, and now with public health as teeth.

It is widely believed the pandemic assured this victory beyond expectation. Leaders elected in time of crisis generally enjoy popularity that quickly fades once the crisis is over. Think about that last aspect.

Isn’t it becoming clear that the existence or not of a virus (and of viral diseases generally) is now more than an academic debating point or even a matter of science? Since it may have been what secured such a strong result, clearly the virus narrative is globalism’s trump card, and get-out-of-jail card all in one. And understanding it is therefore equally crucial to stopping globalism.

Viruses are as political as climate change. They always have been.

Sustainable development and globalism are two of those brave new concepts that appear self-evidently good and enlightened. But when one looks under the hood, it does not mean the ordinary people become citizens of the world and share in consequence-free prosperity. Just the opposite, in fact. It means global control. Full implementation means individuals get a ration of resources supplied by big global brands like Amazon, to consume from the confines of a human habitation zone. It means being completely free to do exactly what is expected of one, and every aspect of ones life being monitored, evaluated and controlled by distant unelected central committees.

Under full globalism, the chances are that the closest people would get to enjoying New Zealand’s unspoilt wide-open spaces would be through the triple-glazed windows of a bullet train between zones. They will not be eating free-range lamb reared on its pastures by a family-run farm.

Ardern has committed New Zealand to United Nations Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030: I didn’t see that on the manifesto. Did you?

And Green Politics has long been hijacked as the means to impose the necessary values. If you don’t know what these agendas mean, then it’s time to find out.

The virus was supposedly defeated by going hard and early. That’s what they claim, at least, without any convincing science to confirm that government action saved anybody. It’s history written by the victor.

But since NZ is virus free and the rest of the world is not, now what? How else can they keep New Zealand “safe” from a virus nobody fears anymore, except by controlling its already tightly controlled borders even further, and lots more besides?

Doesn’t seem like much of a passport to the world to me.

And any time they need to exert a strong hand over the population, all they need to do is ramp up the testing again. The case numbers will automatically increase, since the PCR tests are plagued by false positives, and that will provide the mandate for whatever they want to do. The smiley Ardern government has already shown it is completely willing to use that mandate without any checks and balances, public debate, due process, audit or accountability. People outside the country might not know about the checkpoints, the mandated testing; or the quarantining, not in your home or a hotel, but in an unspecified “facility”.

The science is shoddy, the narrative one-dimensional, the convenience to power unimaginable…

The time has surely come to really ask if this virus is even real. We certainly do not need some kind of novel disease to explain what is happening in the world. It isn’t even a very good explanation.

Some say it was made in a lab. Here is a pinch of salt:

If the virus isn’t real, then the chances are that all those leaks claiming it was lab-derived, weaponised, or something else, are also disinformation. And those leaking such claims are also fake news sources and not to be trusted either. Why leak such a way-out conspiracy theory? Because it keeps otherwise critical thinkers off the trail. Given the enormous political lever offered by the virus, it has to be there; natural, man-made, sicked up by a bat, descended from Mars, whatever. And society must act accordingly.

So, screw the science; or at least, purge any inconvenient data or competing narrative from the web. And that is what has happened.

If the truth and freedom movement cottons on to what some critics say is the unbelievably shoddy state of the science and the near total lack of valid evidence for a novel viral disease, then they are still going to fall victim to whatever numbers the authorities decide to cook up.

What I don’t understand is why so many are so resistant to exploring this; or fail to see at least the vital importance of doing so.

Here is the interview with ‘Virus Mania’ authors Torsten Engelbrech and Claus Kohnlein that pretty much sums up the issues in straightforward terms.

For those who want another source, look at Jon Rappaport’s blog. He has been dissecting this brilliantly for many months now; in fact for years before this crisis began. Again, I am not saying these people are right. I am saying they are making legitimate points that we need to understand and evaluate. Otherwise we could be sleepwalking into a future based on blind trust in government that is all smiles and charisma on election day but manifestly ruthless in action.

[Edited after publishing]

 

 

 

~